"The amount we could export would not solve their egg shortage," says the head of the Finnish Poultry Association.

“The amount we could export would not solve their egg shortage,” says the head of the Finnish Poultry Association.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250316133318/https://yle.fi/a/74-20149786

Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.comEnglish
    4·
    2 hours ago

    I keep saying this. Other nations need to have a public meeting and ask 50% mineral rights and keep saying he’s gambling the health of the nation and has no cards. Anyone betting he goes to Russia?

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    6·
    8 hours ago

    Why not just ask Canada? We are offering as long as we get to stamp each egg with a red maple leaf and print the price on the box.

    The USA can even tack on a tariff, but they can’t change or put labels on the box.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    2·
    7 hours ago

    How would this even work? If sent on a boat, they would have to refrigerate them to damn near freezing so they can make the trip. If flown, the added cost would be steep.

    The whole fresh egg supply chain seems to be linked to local farms.

    • Sirence@feddit.org
      1·
      2 hours ago

      Why would they need to be refrigerated for the trip? Would a ship take longer than 20 days?

      • fubarx@lemmy.world
        1·
        1 hour ago

        It’s a U.S. thing. Eggs are refrigerated to prevent salmonella. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration rules require eggs be kept under 45°F/7°C at all times.

        • Sirence@feddit.org
          1·
          33 minutes ago

          But why would the eggs need to be refrigerated on the ship already? If it’s a US law wouldn’t it just start applying once the eggs reach the US? Here chickens are required to be vaccinated against salmonella anyways so that shouldn’t be a big issue.