Poland, Germany and the Netherlands have signed an agreement on plans to create a “military transport corridor” that would allow troops and equipment to be moved more easily through their territories to bolster NATO’s eastern flank.

They hope the decision will be a step towards creating a broader “military Schengen” zone within Europe that would allow military personnel and equipment to be moved freely just as the existing Schengen area allows free movement of people.

A memorandum of understanding was signed in Brussels yesterday by the three countries on the sidelines of a meeting of European defence ministers.

“We need a military Schengen to move military personnel and materiel more quickly and efficiently,” tweeted Dutch defence minister Kajsa Ollongren. “This will make Europe stronger. We took an important step: Poland, Germany and the Netherlands signed a declaration to achieve a military corridor.”

“Currently, the effectiveness of military mobility is hampered by the different administrative requirements of countries,” noted her Polish counterpart, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz. “In light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, we know how important it is to move efficiently within the EU.”

“We are taking military mobility to a new level on the road to a true military Schengen,” declared Germany’s parliamentary state secretary for defence, Siemtje Möller, quoted by Polskie Radio.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sounds like a good step towards further strengthening the logistics. You definitely can’t fight a proper war or mount a good defence if people and goods are held up by silly bullshit like administrative red tape.

    Also a gentle reminder to everyone: if you see troop and equipment movements anywhere, NO YOU DIDN’T. Keep that shit to yourself and off social media.

  • mirtuevagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Huge improvement for logistics from overseas NATO to Suwalski gap. Port of Rotterdam (NL) is the largest port in Europe.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Suwalki, but yes.

      At the same time, with the Baltic states and Finland in NATO now - and Sweden on the cusp of accession - the Suwalki Gap has become much less of a strategic bottleneck for NATO.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s still the shortest route between Kaliningrad and Belarus, though, so it would still be a major objective for both sides if war were to break out.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh, for sure, it would be a major battleground area (if for no other reason than Putin would LOVE to paste the “Russia Takes Suwalki Gap” as a headline everywhere - it’d be a wet dream for an old KGB spook like him. All I mean is that even if that does happen, it’s not going to be as catastrophic as it would have been before Finland joined, and it’s definitely not going to be as catastrophic as it would have been before the USSR fell. Now, Kaliningrad has become more of a strategic liability than an asset.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m waiting for Medvedev to threaten nukes over this clear provocation.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The EU should just create a military to deal with this. These various ad hoc agreements are shit when having to deal with a real war.

    • lnxtx@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The EU should just create a military to deal with this. These various ad hoc agreements are shit when having to deal with a real war.

      Wasn’t the EU (EEC) a peace project?

      • rammer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Still is. Just because you want peace, you don’t bow down to every dictator that comes along.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The initial goal of the European Coal and Steel Community was to bind different countries’ wartime economies together to help prevent conflict between those nations. While that happened, there was also a military alliance which all members were a part of.