ISPs comply with FCC rule after protesting requirement to list all fees.

  • Magnetron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not an expert, but this seems really consumer friendly, and this should go a long way to promote competition in the marketplace. Then again, I’m not an expert.

      • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        How did it work until now? Are different prices for different speeds not a thing or am I misunderstanding what this bill is supposed to do?

      • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It will probably still help with comparing different plans. I think they should make different monthly rates illegal though. Like a price hike after half the contract is up. Just make it the same motnhly rate for the entire contract.

        • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Like a price hike after half the contract is up.

          It’s a loyalty penalty. Instead of discounts you get fleeced harder.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, most of the modern countries have been showing price, speeds, and data caps for plans for a long time. US is just behind the times.