• Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Seems like the kinda thing that comes down to “because it hasn’t been explicitly told not to yet”. It’s a computer grabbing from an ever changing pool of instances based on parameters, not a person hand picking what they like. Computers aren’t usually aware of social ques or laws…

  • burtek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it just auto-discovers federated instances and randomly shows them on the page unless explicitly disabled…

      • superkret@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only ones who have to be concerned about the looks are the instance admins.
        Lemmy isn’t a product in need of marketing.

        • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right, but this is the sort of thing that gets blown up by the media and used to shut down privacy-friendly platforms.

          Maybe it’s a slippery slope fallacy on my part, but it’s not unimaginable to consider the idea that legislators could try to take down an enitre platform based on something like this. Just look at some of the proposed privacy-antagonistic legislation that’s been introduced recently to see what I mean.

          • superkret@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Fediverse isn’t a platform with a server you can take down, though. That’s the beauty of decentralization.