• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck is with this thread being overrun with dickheads? Is this the breaking point, has Lemmy reached critical mass?

    The image represents how capitalism uses the myth of scarcity. There’s a bed there, and there’s a human being sleeping on the ground. The lie is that there isn’t enough to go around; that somebody has to go without.

    That’s bullshit. We have everything.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The annoying thing is that there will very likely be a homeless shelter in this city that he’s not allowed to sleep in because they have a zero tolerance drug policy.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it… is that store supposed to let people in to sleep on their beds?

  • Fal@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re not using your bed right now. Are you letting a homeless person sleep in it?

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not a contradiction. Your, my, and everyone’s bed is for sleeping in. The beds in that store are for accumulation of wealth. This displays the harsh efficiencies of capitalism, because the people in the most need for a bed cannot afford to have one.

      • dwalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I belive the beds in a store that sells beds are either to be sold or to help you choose a bed. They are not “fuck you, see how many beds i have” beds

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’ll probably be sold at a discount too since it was for display

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right but equally it’s not the mattress company’s job to accommodate the homeless person. It’s not like they didn’t have to pay an inflated price from the manufacturer so if they sold it for the price of the materials they’d probably make a loss.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s what everything everywhere is. Many folks in communist countries lack things others have too.

            Only in a hypothetical utopia could all persons have all things equally.

      • bioemerl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The beds in that store are for accumulation of wealth

        …selling people beds so they have beds to sleep in. Beds that aren’t riddled with bugs thanks to the store not being a homeless shelter.

          • bioemerl@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Best method we have found so far. If you want cookie cutter efficient ass state made beds you can move off to the… Well, every state who has tried has collapsed so you’re shit out of luck.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You mean like the still-existing and highly complex gift economies of natives all across the globe that have no homelessness?

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So beds in the store are for accumulation of wealth but then when someone buys them they’re for sleeping in? Deep

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you so intent on defending the ruling class? You aren’t in their group. You’re a broke ass like the rest of us and you never will achieve anywhere near enough wealth to forget that.

      • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You are conflating Capitalism with consumerism. The former under free market conditions allows the use of all resources. The later under government has Intellectual Property which hinders re-use and recycling as well as encouraging unsound spending with inflationary currency.