• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wouldn’t exactly call BoingBoing a good source for skeptics.

    Just look at the front page- It’s a combination of political gossip, regular gossip and just random trash.

    These are the top three “stories” right now.

    Deutsche Welle it is not.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You proved that boingboing is not a trustworthy website. But it might be still interesting to speculate on why Trump didnt release the medical report (if he indeed, didnt release it)

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Speculating about that sort of thing is not really a skeptical point of view, which is based in evidence. Until we can see what is under the bandage, we will not know why the big bandage is necessary.

        • Codex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Skepticism, also spelled scepticism (from the Greek σκέπτομαι skeptomai, to search, to think about or look for), refers to a doubting attitude toward knowledge.

          It doesn’t require evidence to be a skeptic, merely to question claims made by others. When only dogma and hearsay exist, a skeptic should draw no conclusions.

          However, regarding Trump, based on past evidence of his behavior, a skeptic could assume a high probability of deception in some form.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t think I’ve ever heard it said that a skeptical viewpoint must be rooted in evidence.

          I think people are skeptical of pretty much anything that Trump does or says because he’s a proven serial liar. That still isn’t evidence that any individual claim is false, though.

          Is this a domain specific definition, something outside of conversational usage? Or am I just totally out to lunch?

  • pyr0ball@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Like, is it covering up how miniscule his injury is and is mainly intended to drum up sympathy/anger? More than likely