This is an example of government overreach.
Because it’s a cult who believe in that enslaved to their emotions.
You would think as much as California is falling apart, they would focus on this rather then something of importance. While I loved my time in California, I would never go back.
Over half the article talks about Target’s pride sales and the backlash, and the article doesn’t say what changes Target would be required to make.
This is horrible journalism, and everyone getting worked up in this thread is going off of a headline.
“Told women they don’t control their own bodies”
Boy I really love how you frame infanticide.
It’s also very telling when the first thing you do is an us vs them.
NO ONE should think this is a reasonabke idea, unless they want more government control. And there are plenty on the left who do, orders of magnitude more than on the right.
As leftists love to point out, conservatives are selfishly individualist, so how likely are ideas like this coming from the right?
Boy I really love how you frame infanticide.
Bodily autonomy is not infanticide.
Full text of the bill for those interested
Overall, it’s insanely vague, and just reads like it was written just so that they could hit businesses with fines if they feel the business doesn’t sufficiently play their games. Total overreach by commiefornia
I’m no opposed to regulations but this isn’t something the government should be regulating.
Wait, I thought gender was a construct?
Who decides the meaning of “gender neutral toy”?
Aren’t these the same people who say things aren’t gendered, and boys can wear dresses and play with barbies?
I’m so confused.
Also, the drive by downvoters are a riot! They’re so weak minded they can’t tolerate anything but their narrow minded ideology.
Shouldn’t they have an aisle for each gender? Wouldn’t that be the proper way to handle this?
Oh no! Legos and skateboards will no longer require genitalia to enjoy!
They don’t require that now. I am not sure why a law needs to require it.