fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoScientific Successmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1345arrow-down18
arrow-up1337arrow-down1external-linkScientific Successmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareLag@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 months agoWhile this graph is speed over time, it would be more beneficial to measure particles over time so that you can also approximate the volume of each fart under each curve.
minus-squareXenny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 months agoI think he graph is simply titled fart speed? The bottom part may measure audibility
minus-squareloaExMachina@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoHow would they measure the number of particles in the first place tho ?
minus-squareLag@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoThey already have the speed measurement, they just need to multiply that by the sphincter diameter.
While this graph is speed over time, it would be more beneficial to measure particles over time so that you can also approximate the volume of each fart under each curve.
I think he graph is simply titled fart speed? The bottom part may measure audibility
How would they measure the number of particles in the first place tho ?
They already have the speed measurement, they just need to multiply that by the sphincter diameter.
Taste test?
Pooticulomometer.
How do they measure the speed?
Using a Pitot tube
a P’Toot tube?