• Where are you seeing that it was in Feb? The ballotpedia you linked to said it was August 1st for PA.

      According to West’s complaint, he submitted nominating papers with 13,000 signatures this summer.
      However, the department rejected those papers, finding that West didn’t have “candidate affidavits” for all 19 electors that he submitted.
      According to the complaint, that process is required only in the event of a third-party candidate.

      So if it wasn’t for the “candidate affidavits” requirement he would have met the deadline. Basically he’s rather reasonably asking that the court declare that requirement illegal since it’s not equally applied, and then retroactively accept his papers.

      It’s a fair enough deal. I don’t think it’d work as the reason it’s not required for the two big parties - those would obviously be able to get electors w/o issue. More likely the judge will just rule that Dems and GOP have to comply with this rule too (which is trivial for them to do so) and keep West off.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the link I provided, the state by state chart, Pennsylvania has 2 lines, one for the Democratic party, one for “other qualified parties”, deadline date of February.

        • Thanks for the pointer, I see it now. Super helpful! Also worth calling out that the Dems had an earlier deadline that that still met easily so it’s not a good showing if this independent couldn’t get it in with a laxer deadline…

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    These people have to know they have literally 0 chance of winning. What possible fucking purpose could he legitimately have to have this need to be on the ballot?

    I really don’t want to be Mr.Conspiracy but here, but obvious spoiler is obvious…

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just because he’s had Republican operatives helping organize and fund the campaign doesn’t mean he’s a spoiler. It’s a really really really good indicator. But it isn’t strictly conclusive. Just almost.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago
    Pittsburgh Tribune Review - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Pittsburgh Tribune Review:

    MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://triblive.com/news/pennsylvania/cornel-west-argues-to-be-placed-on-pennsylvanias-presidential-ballot/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support