The core issue is that you only have 2 real options in america, third parties may as well not exist.

There’s false assumptions necessary to reach this conclusion. Typically the false assumption is that the role of a third party is to win. The root cause of making this assumption is often that the scope of evaluation has been limited to one term or cycle.

If 5% of the general election popular vote for POTUS, knowing that the candidate cannot win, still voted for the Green Party platform then what effect would that have upon the Democratic Party platform?

On a five point difficulty scale this is a two. The test gets way harder than this.

I’m not sure what response you expect to ad hominem. This’ll have to suffice.

What is it that they’re sending that results in a warrant for their arrest?

It’s a tactic of the propaganda machine to redefine and demonize our semantic.

What you’re missing is the semantic and context inherent a syllabus. If you find a mentor that helps develop a syllabus then it’ll become much easier to find learning resources.

That’s the sound of da beast.

They’re mask-on anarcho-capitalists.

Live for today. Gone tomorrow. That’s me.

Remember that you’re not crazy for or alone in wanting that privacy. If I saw you shooting them out with a pellet gun then no, I didn’t.

One might also note that in that context “What is Caesar’s” could be responded to with “nothing.”

The New Testament is mostly Jesus then Paul repeatedly telling everyone with increasing amounts of frustration,

Reason from principles to situation for yourselves.

It’s fallacy fallacy. I got close to the right answer for highly-questionable subjective reasoning that’s barely better than luck.

I held on tightly to my principles, reasoned it out, and voted for a platform that represents my best interests.

Did you vote for a platform that represents your best interests?

I feel like an opportunity was missed. Buffalo Bill wears buffalo pelt, Grizzly Adams grizzly pelt, and…

They’re not loosing so long as the illusion of choice is preserved.

Fixed it for you.

unprovoked violent threat; victim so calloused to violence they still communicate simply and honestly; assailant sparing the innocent and guiding them to a safer area

Is this an american day to day occurance?

It’s pretty much every encounter I’ve ever had with a gang member.

I’ve had his role a couple times on a smaller scale. My job was to make one or two decisions per day, communicate the ideology of why to subordinates, and hold them accountable. I spent tens of hours reasoning why and how, then ten minutes doing the work.

Elon skips the reasoning part. He just spends a few minutes per day communicating nonsense. My favorite line so far is, “We coup who we want.”

I think we define “tankie” differently.

I’ll appeal to urban dictionary as the authority to say that no hard-line Stalinist wants Trump except as a means of acceleration towards capitalism’s downfall.