Guess the state…

  • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Yeah. I also wish people would realise that seatbelts are there for a reason. It’s all fun and games until someone flies through a windshield.

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      A seatbelt saved my life twice in the span of a year and a half. Luckily haven’t needed it since… still use it though.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I had a coworker that refused to use them. Believed they killed more people than they saved. He went flying out of his work vehicle and died.

        I’ve always been someone that uses seatbelts, but after that I was even more adamant about it.

        • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          It blows my fucking mind that when I was born “it’s safer to be thrown clear of the accident” was a thing that people commonly, unironically believed. It seems to be less prevalent today, but after witnessing the collective pushback to covid measures… yeah, common sense isn’t as a common as the name implies.

          • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yeah, he said the seatbelt would cut an artery in your neck and kill you or something. So, at least that didn’t happen I guess.

          • Jjakef96@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Just to play devil’s advocate as I agree seatbelts should always be used. But if you think back then how cars were designed, they didn’t have well designed crumple zones to absorb the impact. So if your options are to get pancaked between metal or go flying out the window, flying at least gives you a chance of survival.

            • oleorunOPMA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              But if you think back then how cars were designed, they didn’t have well designed crumple zones to absorb the impact. So if your options are to get pancaked between metal or go flying out the window, flying at least gives you a chance of survival.

              Crumple zones don’t extend into the car’s cabin. They absorb the impact, much like a bunch of accordians. The kinetic energy is dispersed.

              The cabin area is surrounded by a cage of steel designed to protect the occupant. Jaws of Life, essentially hydraulic bolt cutters/scissors/something you want your fingers to avoid at all costs, are used to cut through those steel reinforcements in accidents where the cabin is compromised.

              Any accident involves more variables than can be predicted. Speed, road shape and conditions, tire quality, driving experience, vehicle weight, all of this can throw a vehicle, and its occupant, into the unknown data category. Thus, auto manufacturers do their best to try to keep the occupants safe and in the car. That’s unironically the safest place in an accident.

              When a person is flying out of the window, nothing but the air resistance or earth of some sort is slowing down the kinetic energy. Glass, metal, and physics are not the compromising sort.

              Edit: I reread your comment and you are exactly right. Old cars were protected by pure metal, no crumple zones needed. Great idea, until it wasn’t. Didn’t mean to lemmysplain to you. Hopefully this comment is useful to someone lol.