I’ll spell it out for you. I’m one of millions of random people online right now, there’s no way you actually care about me in particular. We’ve had a fairly nice conversation up to now where I have my opinion and you have yours but neither of us has convinced the other. So now, since you don’t have any good arguments against why we shouldn’t handle different milestones, rights, and privileges separately instead of lumping them together and giving them all at once, you are trying to find out where in particular I think individual milestones should be set so that you can argue about that instead, and frankly, I’m not interested in going off on a tangent with some random person on the Internet who likes to argue.
I haven’t made any arguments about a particular view just trying to understand yours. For whatever reason you’ve decided to dance around every question I ask. There has been no attempt on either of our parts to convince the other, I’ve only asked questions. Now you’re getting defensive about being called out for your refusal to have a discussion.
In order to understand your position on having different milestones it would be helpful to understand your reasoning for a few. Ie why do you think the drinking age should be … age to vote … Age for liability …
Saying you’d let the states figure it out is not giving an opinion it’s a cop out or an admission that you can’t articulate why.
A pilots license and drivers license both have age and competency requirements. However anyone can fly an ultralight at any age.
How about liability? Signing contracts? Voting?
Yup, I’m fine with all those having individual, differing, requirements.
What do you think the requirements should be for signing contracts, liability, voting?
Don’t ask me, that’s up to the voters of each state to figure out.
Why do you suddenly not have an opinion?
Oh, I absolutely have them.
Strange, you you seem unable to articulate them
I’ll spell it out for you. I’m one of millions of random people online right now, there’s no way you actually care about me in particular. We’ve had a fairly nice conversation up to now where I have my opinion and you have yours but neither of us has convinced the other. So now, since you don’t have any good arguments against why we shouldn’t handle different milestones, rights, and privileges separately instead of lumping them together and giving them all at once, you are trying to find out where in particular I think individual milestones should be set so that you can argue about that instead, and frankly, I’m not interested in going off on a tangent with some random person on the Internet who likes to argue.
I haven’t made any arguments about a particular view just trying to understand yours. For whatever reason you’ve decided to dance around every question I ask. There has been no attempt on either of our parts to convince the other, I’ve only asked questions. Now you’re getting defensive about being called out for your refusal to have a discussion.
In order to understand your position on having different milestones it would be helpful to understand your reasoning for a few. Ie why do you think the drinking age should be … age to vote … Age for liability …
Saying you’d let the states figure it out is not giving an opinion it’s a cop out or an admission that you can’t articulate why.