• infeeeee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    OSM exists to record and map facts, not to dictate them. If some people call it that way, than it should be recorded in the database, it’s not about personal preferences and politics, we shouldn’t decide if the name is right or not. If you read the linked forum thread you can see that it is purely technical, about how we should record it in the database and when (now vs when and if it will become official)

    It’s a bit annoying in here that a lot of people misunderstands this, and comments recommendations with near zero osm mapping experience, this is about how to map a thing on OpenStreetMap, not about politics.

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I could imagine Trump deciding that a random bird needed to be named after himself, and inaturalist having a forum discussion about localization etc. It’s probably the same kind of debate here

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How does OSM deal with Arabian Gulf / Persian Gulf? I’ve only ever seen it referred to by the latter name by western sources but only the former name in Arabic over here.

      I’m well aware that the name “declaration” of Arabian Gulf was a political move in the 20th century, but I’ve never seen the name Persian Gulf in Arabic. Never.

      Just curious.