https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/ULWGL

From the github:

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR OTHER LAUNCHERS (lutris/bottles/heroic/legendary,etc):

  • everyone can use + contribute to the same protonfixes, no more managing individual install scripts per launcher
  • everyone can run their games through proton just like a native steam game
  • no steam or steam binaries required
  • a unified online database of game fixes (protonfixes)
  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    0·
    9 months ago

    Yeah - that was my worry.

    Unification of standards only works if everyone agrees to use it and only it (i.e. mobile phones and USB C), otherwise you’re just adding another one to the pile.

    • firecat@kbin.social
      0·
      9 months ago

      My worry is Valve will look at the project and shut it down. Remember, Valve doesn’t care about your Linux, it only cares about money. Not having users on their Client side platform means less revenue and less ads to show.

      • cjf@feddit.ukEnglish
        0·
        9 months ago

        This doesn’t affect valve at all though. It’s borrowing their tech that they’ve made open source, and figuring out how to use it elsewhere outside of steam.

        Actually, it’ll benefit them. More eyes are on proton and any fix will benefit everyone, including games played via steam.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          0·
          9 months ago

          It’s really up to the corporation whether they think it will benefit them. I agree that Valve has so far not been hostile toward GE, and it looks like proton has a very permissive license, but if it were any other digital storefront, doing anything to allow users to consume your content without using your storefront would be seen as at attack on their bottom line.

          I’m actually curious how this new standard would potentially benefit other storefronts who haven’t natively supported Linux yet. If it’s going to make things easier for existing open source launchers, then it would also make things easier for competing launchers. I know as a consumer, I want GOG, Epic, EA, etc. supporting Linux, but does valve? I don’t know, maybe, maybe not. On the one hand, maybe they don’t want competition in their niche space, on the other hand, maybe they’ll do anything to take marketshare from msft.

          • Kaldo@kbin.social
            0·
            9 months ago

            Valve’s Proton is open source but is it also free to use and distribute in commercial software? Cuz if so, there’d be nothing stopping GOG or Epic from implementing it already, they don’t need this project at all

            • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
              0·
              9 months ago

              Someone else already explained the licenses, but to your second point, yes, nothing stops any other launcher from using proton, which is what all the other open source launchers do. And yes, no one “needs” this project, just like we don’t “need” any standards for anything, but it could make things a lot cleaner and easier to support.

        • firecat@kbin.social
          0·
          9 months ago

          “Third party software included and respected byproducts of Valve’s proprietary”

          Legit doesn’t mean you own all the code.

            • firecat@kbin.social
              0·
              9 months ago

              You’re the troll if you can’t explain why no one owns all the code. You can’t even accept the lawsuits that the people of America brought against to Valve Corporation.

              Dont talk like you have anything worthwhile going when you refuse to acknowledge their crimes.

                • firecat@kbin.social
                  0·
                  9 months ago

                  You cannot download all the code, try it bitch i know you can’t because i also cant. Next time confirm your conspiracy theory first.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            0·
            9 months ago

            Afaik proton is BSD-3, and everything else important is part of wine which is LGPL. Sure, valve can be hostile if they choose, but they haven’t given themselves the legal tools to do much.

            Edit: DXVK is apparently under the zlib license.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      0·
      9 months ago

      This is a bigger issue for hardware than software. This is why we can use heroic, proton, lutris, or whatever. And most programmers who can offload a part of their code onto another project that is doing the job well will. That’s exactly how Linux started.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        0·
        9 months ago

        It is a big issue for software. But usually companies are happy to try to trap users into their own thing, or developers are too arrogant to work with thee work on another developer.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          0·
          9 months ago

          You realize we’re talking about multiple projects based on WINE, which has had updates supplied by Valve, who has made a Linux distribution, which is based on multiple different projects all packaged together in one big install file, right?

          Yes, you will get ego and “not invented here” syndrome in software, even in open software. But these groups are literally based on building off another person or group’s idea to make something better or easier.