How do you respond to this? It’s not something I’ve done a lot of research into, but it seems like one of the few critiques where you just say “critical support for the USSR, we need to learn from the past mistakes the soviets made and do better the next time around.”

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    If the second one, why anarchist suddenly concerned with ethnic purity?

    Sorry to sound defensive of liberalism, but there’s a difference between caring about ethnic purity and not wanting forced relocations of ethnic groups.

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Because workers arriving to build irrigation projects are not exactly “forced relocation”. And again, forced relocations were very much bad and a mistake, but they weren’t russians being relocated.

      Now some of these projects by themselves, were ill considered and not relied on local expertise, and just vibe-did stuff (especially agriculture during corn-man-khrush ), but i find it hard to believe sinister motive around them

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Fair about Russians specifically which is the subject of the thread. You already gave the disclaimer about Tartars, so you’re good, I was just spelling it out explicitly.