Article

Voters in the largest city in America are choosing a Democratic nominee for mayor via ranked-choice voting. The crowded field is led by former governor Andrew Cuomo, who resigned from the state’s top office four years ago following sexual harassment allegations; state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, who snagged key endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York); Comptroller Brad Lander, who made headlines when he was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at an immigration hearing last week; and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams.

This is a ranked-choice primary – only first-choice votes will be tabulated on election night. Final vote calculations will be released July 1 and updated weekly until all ballots are counted. Republican Curtis Sliwa is uncontested in his primary.

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well he is a liberal zionist. I don’t think it really matters, and I don’t know if I would say anything different to him were I in his position (I don’t think it would win a lot of votes to say “I would make use of the armed forces of the NYPD to assist Hamas with doing 1000 more Al Aqsa Floods”). Not to mention he will probably have to be fighting the state government on everything.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        No he just said he believes Israel has a right to exist as a nation with equal rights. A cop out answer (which is almost definitely the correct move when you’re running for a position that has literally nothing to do with Israel)

        • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well, technically speaking that “with equal rights” part is essentially what the resistance demands. ‘Israel’ wouldn’t be ‘Israel’ if it had equal rights. This could be a very cautious, borderline cowardly, way to express a sensible position.

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s pretty funny when you frame it this way because it shows that applying the same views that MLK had about Black people in the US to Palestine will prescribe you to support Hamas. You want equal rights? Get ready to put a grenade in a Merkava, buddy goku-halal

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah I don’t believe that’s his real position he just wants to avoid being bogged down in that being the only topic he ever gets to talk about (it is anyway but you know). Every time I’ve seen him the media behaviour has reminded me so much of Corbyn it’s uncanny.

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think it would win a lot of votes to say “I would make use of the armed forces of the NYPD to assist Hamas with doing 1000 more Al Aqsa Floods”

      Sir, do you have any idea how BASED you were posting? columbo

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s a bit tomato tomahto. In theory, if Israel recognizes equal rights for Palestinians, then that’s great and it would be a one state solution. In practice, that will never happen as long as “Israel” occupies Palestine. So if he was running for a position where his beliefs about Occupied Palestine actually mattered, I would want him to be pressed on how he thinks Israel should become a country where equal rights for Jews and Arabs are upheld, because that’s the difference between liberal zionism and antizionism (liberal zionists would be happy to just wait for equal rights to materialize from nothing, antizionists believe in resistance and overthrowing the occupiers).

        • sempersigh [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          . In practice, that will never happen as long as “Israel” occupies Palestine.

          I think he already knows this and his position is to not do any “no nos” and to at most lie by omission rather than lie outright. Would he have won if he didn’t play that game anyway? Tough to say at this point; perhaps it would have been closer but I think he actually would have but I don’t think zohran thought he would have at the time

          imagine if everyone in the west bank/gaza and the diapora could vote to elect seats into the knesset… it would never happen… but we could just advocate for it anyway and use it as a shield to beat the zios back with and what can they say? this would never happen but if it actually did I could only assume the knesset would at some point vote to change the name of the state to palestine.<---- no liberal zionist actually desires to allow this to happen but zohrans position was to exist in this weird position of thought so he didn’t have to sacrifice his views on the question of Palestinians while still being able to stay stuff like “israel has a right to exist with equal rights” .

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah I absolutely agree which is why I said it’s only a technical difference, not to mention it simply doesn’t matter as mayor of NYC. He’s a good lad.