Cross-posted from “Is running Librewolf without disabling fingerprinting worth it?” by @[email protected] in [email protected]
Without disabling fingerprinting, zoom options aren’t saved, dark mode doesn’t really work and Netflix is blocked. But is it even worth running Librewolf if you enable fingerprinting? Isn’t that one of the main reasons why one runs Librewolf?
Use this website to check if your fingerprint resisting is actually effective. Even when using librewolf, I still had a unique fingerprint. So I installed NoScript to fix that issue, and then I disabled resist fingerprinting since it wasn’t really benefitting me.
Also use this to corroborate the data
It says “API access is denied”… is that good??
librewolf is all about privacy and being minimal compared to firefox. most people be like i have nothing to hide so i dont need privacy, thats why they dont use librewolf. but if you want to disable fingerprinting for convenience and give up privacy, then go ahead. i mean its still better than firefox without any mozilla bullshits and telemetry
Mullvad Browser is likely better, since it’s basically Tor browser without Tor.
@fishie also comes with ublock by default
Isn’t that one of the main reasons why one runs Librewolf?
Recently it’s also to escape Mozilla’s new, sleazy TOS.
And removing all sorts of other annoying components that nobody wants or needs.
