TL;DR

Don’t use snapchat

    • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Shouldn’t it be all encrypted with SSL?

      All the airport wifi could do is see the DNS requests (and the modern trend is to have DoH or DoT enabled by default, for example in the up to date versions of Android)

      • JohnnyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        From the article:

        A court in Madrid heard it was assumed the message triggered alarm bells after being picked up via Gatwick’s Wi-Fi network.

        Public wifi without a VPN is like sex without a condom. The connection may not be encrypted (very risky) and even if it is, you are still susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks: https://www.garlandtechnology.com/blog/how-to-monitor-encrypted-traffic-and-keep-your-network-secure

        I guarantee there will be a flood of articles about this over the next few days because of what I quoted above.

        It’s also possible that one of his “friends” reported him or something like that.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Please explain to me how using Public WiFi is unsafe if the traffic is encrypted with TLS. Unless they somehow installed a keylogger on everyone connected to said Wifi and picked it up from there, the only way this was possible was on some quick text analysis and recognising the IP address from Snapchat

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wouldn’t expect my data to be secure, but I wouldn’t expect to be prosecuted as if I had willfully made it a public statement.