As sci-fi show’s 60th anniversary nears, a collector pleads for BBC to offer amnesty to those with recordings discarded by corporation

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So unless I missed something, I didn’t see any place where the BBC went after the collectors for illegal recording. This sounds like they’re scared of something that hasn’t happened and, at least in this case the BBC is very happy to have found a copy.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article states what they are worried about

      This would reassure British amateur collectors that their private archives will not be confiscated if they come forward and that they will be safe from prosecution for having stored stolen BBC property, something several fear.

      • asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder how many episodes would miraculously show up if the BBC made a public statement that they wouldn’t hold it against them

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes.

      There is nothing in the law that makes that a relevant factor, and there are simple examples where you’d clearly not want it to be. If I was working on a novel, sent a copy to an editor, but then my hard drive crashed, it’d be more than a little annoying if that suddenly voided my copyright and my publisher then proceeded to publish my novel without giving me any money at all since it’s suddenly become public domain.

      I get the point you’re trying to make, but this isn’t the kind of thing you generally build into law because there are always edge cases that can cause problems. It’s simpler to correctly assume that the copyright holder almost certainly won’t object the existence of the copy while retaining the rights to them.