David Gerard@awful.systemsM to

TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 21 days ago

I find absolutely consistently that gen-AI advocates are literally unable to tell good output from bad output. They think people who say their output is garbage are just lying to have a go at them.

1

I find absolutely consistently that gen-AI advocates are literally unable to tell good output from bad output. They think people who say their output is garbage are just lying to have a go at them.

David Gerard@awful.systemsM to

TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 21 days ago

xcancel: https://xcancel.com/sama/status/1899535387435086115

Chat

David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
0·
edit-2
20 days ago
i’ve changed my mind, cursor is now the best ai coding tool

(just writing this up as today’s Pivot)

TechTakes@awful.systems

techtakes@awful.systems

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

15 users / day
80 users / week
209 users / month
962 users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
1.74K subscribers
721 Posts
20.5K Comments
Modlog

mods:
David Gerard@awful.systems