• Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    As soon as I get that visa, I’m running to the EU. I don’t feel like dealing with more freedom that only the EU can get, I don’t feel like being jealous at them anymore, I might as well join them.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      not with the current “shift to the right” we’re doing. these parties will do and say anything to get into power and foreigners out of their country.

      but me and many other average citizens would very much like to welcome you with open arms.

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, some politicians are straight up weird.

        In their defense, though, some immigrants are straight up weird (keyword: SOME).

        Honestly, I’m the kind of future immigrant who hates his country with an absolute passion and refuses to be patriotic or nationalistic. I literally cannot integrate into my own society. Also, criminalization of LGBT rights. I just gotta mention that.

        The EU really does feel like a great place to be in.

        • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          on the ‘area to exist in’ list, europe definetely ranks very high.

          the high cost of living is definetely a thing to consider, but wages are pretty fair if you learn a specific profession and you get pretty good healthcare by default.

          plus almost everyone under 60ish years of age speaks english to a degree, so you can bridge the gap of learning the local language pretty well.

          oh yeah and we take human rights at least more seriously than the US of course.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Come to the dark side! We have GDPR and we’ll get browser choice in iOS soon (because as much as I hate having my software freedom being taken away, iOS is the superior experience if you don’t have time to tweak everything. This is coming from someone who’s had a custom ROM on every single one of their Android phones).

      You also can’t be fired without cause in I believe most EU countries, definitely not in mine (Estonia).

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have literally never used GDPR in my life because whenever my phone claims to use it (last time that happened was with my old iPhone 4), it basically means that there’s no internet at all. I’m pretty sure that’s just a weird thing with my country. We don’t even have 5G yet.

        Also, wait, you can actually get fired without cause outside of the EU? Why would anyone have the balls to do that??

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Honestly, it’s possible. A lack of incentive is half of the issue, the other half is the lack of talent working on a jailbreak because the community is full of the most maddeningly annoying children to have ever been birthed. It’s much more profitable to sell the increasingly complex bugs than to use them. If the jailbreak community manages to avoid doxxing, threatening, or disparaging a major dev for a few months, something might eventually come out.

  • Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    USB C, 3rd party app installing, free browser engine and easly removable batteries in 3 years. Iphone suddenly becomes an amazing option

      • generalpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        *if you ignore the shitfest it is with mandating play store/play services, bricking phones, google screwing up Pixel updates, a fiasco of some sort with each Pixel iteration, Samsung literally adding shit to macro shots and calling it “AI”.

        Android isn’t a silver bullet it’s made out to be.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          just get a pixel and put lineage on it, works perfectly and has none of these downsides

          i have two ultimately minor complaints: no sd card slot and no headphone jack, the first isn’t a huge issue especially not for the average person and the latter being solved with an adapter, and also isn’t really a big issue since there’s more than enough battery that charging at the same time isn’t needed.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Android is neither silver nor bullet, it’s pure gold next to the pile of poo with a chewed apple on top.

            • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Tried the iPad pro 2 years ago because everyone raved about how good and amazing it is. I gave it a good 6 months try before I concluded it was a pile of junk. Sure it’s powerful, but any serious multitasking and customization is only possible with jalbreaking or not at all. Dumped it and went to the Samsung tab S7 plus. Couldn’t be happier. Does everything the iPad does but is also competent and friendly to the user’s wishes.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      We slowly fix problems below and above the OS. But there is very much left to do in the OS itself, like no access to drivers or any low-level interfaces.

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    That was always a bullshit move by Apple and crippled the Firefox product in an unacceptable and cartel law questionable dimension. MS had a Monopoly on IE, by giving advantages binding it to the OS? Apple did the exact same thing on iOS with Safari.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The problem is that the US doesn’t necessarily regulate anticompetitive behavior if the company has not achieved a monopoly. Microsoft pretty much had one at the time so they were exposed. Our regulatory regime is not designed to protect us from the tech oligopoly

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Apple must allow under EU regulation, full versions of Chrome and Firefox to run on the iPhone.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Apple’s censorship and control have been intolerable since the iPhone launched.

    It’s your phone. Not theirs. That’s what the money was for.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        We ignore the fact on computer you can choose the OS and on this Microsoft OS you can choose the source of programs? Windows is very limiting, but even with all the crapware you can still say you own it. At least until Windows on ARM kick in and we see if what I said would still hold true.

  • the_q@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If only the US had the balls to keep these trillion dollar companies in line instead of the other way around.

      • highduc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As someone who’s only owned Androids, it’s just a different walled garden. It’s a duopoly instead of a monopoly.

        You can’t really own your phone whatever you do. Even if you root it all your important apps like banking ones will stop working so there really isn’t a choice.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Android is a walled garden that has a gate with a latch. If one cares to put in the effort it isn’t terribly difficult to root Android and strip the Google stuff.
          Apple is a walled garden that simply has empty void on the other side of a 4 foot thick concrete wall. Jailbreaking has limited results and an incredible amount of DRM is integrated at the kernel and hardware level that can never be removed.

          • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            That brings about two problems for me. How about phones with locked bootloaders? And the reverse of that, is how do you keep phones with unlocked bootloaders from getting poison-pilled into the supply chain? IE from someone buying a pallet of phones flashing malware infected firmware and just returning it back to the warehouse for the populace at large to use. And some stuff you just can’t degoogle, at least not without a bunch of patching or just straight breaking functionality like what happens in trying to switch to say GrapheneOS (One of the best supported Alt Android distros I have seen) where notifications for most apps don’t work unless you patch back in a lite version of google apps or patch the app to use different protocols, and many apps expecting a “secure” (Google filled) environment will just not run again without patching.

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not corruption, it’s working as intended. The citizens united case ruled that paying off legislators is equivalent to voting. We literally live in a textbook oligarchy, this is how it works and it’s working by design that way.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I feel like your point is almost excusing it. Just because the corruption is working doesn’t mean it’s not corruption.

          • Tak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s more that corruption is to say the system isn’t supposed to work this way.

            corruption noun cor·​rup·​tion kə-ˈrəp-shən Synonyms of corruption 1 a : dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people (such as government officials or police officers) : depravity b : inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means (such as bribery) the corruption of government officials c : a departure from the original or from what is pure or correct the corruption of a text the corruption of computer files d : decay, decomposition the corruption of a carcass

            It’s not dishonest or illegal behavior. It is entirely within the fucked up letter of the law. Systemic change is needed not purity.

              • Tak@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                It’s really not if you read the constitution you’ll see how it gives power to the elites/ruling class and why the anti federalists opposed the constitution.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s not an excuse. The system isnt broken and needs to be reformed. The system is working as intended and needs to be abolished.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Nah, that’s just the typical small mindset that things should be cast away just because they have problems.

              Like police. We NEED police, just not the same organization we currently have, and certainly not a police force that intermingles violent and non-violent events. We need police who don’t reach for a gun and we need police who can deal with armed criminals.

              The economy can be fixed. We just need a government with the balls to actually tax rich assholes and fund social services.

              • bazmatazable@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                The wealthy actively lobby for tax breaks and relaxed regulation meanwhile the working majority don’t seem to be able to stand together and demand social programs or protections from big businesses. The government is not corrupt for delivering the change that is asked if it. Easier said than done but change for the better is possible.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Always remember what comes first in any national emergency. Whats the first thing our leaders always make clear when the chips are down?

      "We will do everything necessary to protect our beloved nation society struggling citizens ECONOMY."

      People don’t matter here, only capital. If you are attached to meaningful capital, you will want for nothing and live in embarrassing decadence that would make pharoahs blush, if you aren’t attached to meaningful capital, you are livestock for those that are. You are less than human in the eyes of the capital hoarders in charge.

      Those are our American Values in practice.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The US absolutely has the balls. They’re currently bound and being used by the corporations to lead us around.

      Yeah, we should probably say something about how they treat us, but God damn if our politicians don’t have the biggest fucking orgasm every time a billionaire compliments them.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        “The US has the balls.”

        Ah yes, that’s why the government is on it’s knees in front of these corporations … because it has balls… yep, the government sure has balls … on it’s chin.

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I feel like you didn’t read my comment since we’re essentially making the same joke. But funny comment

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Unregulated and unhindered capitalism is the American way. If the government interferes by saying that companies aren’t allowed to do whatever they want, that’s just socialism, communism or whatever it is that those Europeans are up to these days.

      /s just in case.

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not sure what you mean by ; keeping in line…

      I mean they’re collaborating with them to spy on the American nation and the entire world, with their creatively named secret projects…

  • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    so does this mean i can finally install extensions on my company issued ipad?

    of course mozilla still has to develop a whole new browser, but will this mean they get to?

  • onion@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    "This change is a result of the DMA’s requirements, and means that EU users will be confronted with a list of default browsers before they have the opportunity to understand the options available to them,” the company says. “The screen also interrupts EU users’ experience the first time they open Safari intending to navigate to a webpage.”

    lol Apple is throwing a tantrum

  • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Article talks about how Chrome will be happening almost immediately and I’m like… why? Why would you switch to Chrome when you know it’s going to reduce your ability to keep things private. Firefox will be a different story hopefully, but even then it will be interesting to see if it can pass the fingerprint test finally on an iPhone. (Currently nothing can.)

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      People use chrome because they’re used to chrome (and because it has the best website compatibility thanks to its near monopoly). And most people sadly don’t care about their privacy.

      I personally try to use as little Google products as I can and am happy using a mixture of Safari and Firefox (depending on the platform)

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    With iOS 17.4, Apple is making a number of huge changes to the way its mobile operating system works in order to comply with new regulations in the EU.

    One of them is an important product shift: for the first time, Apple is going to allow alternative browser engines to run on iOS — but only for users in the EU.

    Apple is clearly only doing this because it is required to by the EU’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA), which stipulates, among other things, that users should be allowed to uninstall preinstalled apps — including web browsers — that “steer them to the products and services of the gatekeeper.” In this case, iOS is the gatekeeper, and WebKit and Safari are Apple’s products and services.

    Even in its release announcing the new features, Apple makes clear that it’s mad about them: “This change is a result of the DMA’s requirements, and means that EU users will be confronted with a list of default browsers before they have the opportunity to understand the options available to them,” the company says.

    Apple argues (without any particular merit or evidence) that these other engines are a security and performance risk and that only WebKit is truly optimized and safe for iPhone users.

    But in the EU, we’re likely to see these revamped browsers in the App Store as soon as iOS 17.4 drops in March: Google, for one, has been working on a non-WebKit version of Chrome for at least a year.


    The original article contains 596 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 58%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wonder how long it will take for Mozilla to make a proper iOS version. I suspect that Apple didn’t give them any notice.