• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Artificially” probably does a lot of work in that law. I suspect there may need to be some “intent to deceive” involved. Otherwise anybody simply giving an opinion on a product or stock could he seen as manipulation.

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In certain contexts the opinions of some federal officials is quite a bit more than “simply giving an opinion”. The most obvious examples being the chairman of the Federal Reserve and the Commerce Secretary.