• NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The King of Jordan approved a bill Saturday to punish online speech deemed harmful to national unity, according to the Jordanian state news agency, legislation that has drawn accusations from human rights groups of a crackdown on free expression in a country where censorship is on the rise.

    Okay, so it’s not all online speech, just those statements that the government deems harmful without any clarity on what specifically that would entail. Just some good old-fashioned fascism right here.

    • finn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The King of Jordan

      fascism

      I’m not sure that this is surprising coming from Jordan, but he’s a monarchist not a fascist.

      • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And it surprises me that he passed this law. As far as I remember he was trying to reform the country into a more democratic one

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its always a bit funny to see people conflate the two, by simply applying the “bad = bad” rubric.

        Fascists, for all their faults, do tend to have a certain degree of popular appeal. Meanwhile, modern day robber barons mostly just have a bunch of armed minions ready to terrorize anyone that crosses them in the midst of their local looting and pillaging.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is just unchecked conservatism doing what it does.

    Conservatism is a plague of oppression that is in desperate need of a cure. Do your part by disowning and excluding conservatives in your daily life. It is inappropriate to do business or keep relationships with such people.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, its a monarchy. Monarchies can’t exist in the face of unregulated speech and assembly, because they necessarily do things the bulk of the population hates in order to reproduce as a social class.

      Disowning and Excluding monarchs isn’t any kind of practical solution. Neither the Prince of Wales nor the King of Siam actually give a shit about whether I’m friends with them on Facebook. And pretending I can avoid doing business with a guy who owns all the real estate that makes up the country sort of misses the reason monarchs have all this power to begin with.

      You can’t socially distance yourself from monarchism, shy of fleeing the monarchical state. This isn’t a problem that’s solved with consumer choice because Monarchs - by their very nature - don’t afford you a choice of leadership.