I’m looking for opinions on org-roam from people that used plain old org for notes extensively before trying org-roam. I’ve trying to figure out if I’m missing anything by not trying org-roam and it’s hard because when I ask org-roam users what they get out of it they tend to reply with stuff that I already know how to do in org: daily notes, capture notes quickly and unobtrusively, searching for notes, linking to other notes. Often it turns out these org-roam users did not use org before org-roam. The exceptions to functionality being available in org that I see mentioned are automatic backlinks and a graphical representation of the link structure.
I have no interest in the seeing the link graph, but I’m not sure about automatic backlinks. In what ways do people find them useful?
It could also happen that the org-roam features I feel I already have in org (daily notes, capturing, searching and linking) are somehow better in org-roam than in plain org. Fair enough, for example I wasn’t completely happy with searching and linking in org by itself, so I now use the excellent org-ql package for those tasks. Could someone who has done these things both in plain org and org-roam describe if and how they are improved in org-roam? Particularly, is capturing in org-roam somehow better than org-capture? Are org-roam dailies better than a datetree?
@oantolin agreed, makes me want to stop reading a book when I see this. I’m enjoying strog women roles in some shows (Arcane, Silo), but it’s still harder in books.
This comment seem out of place here. Did you mean to post this somewhere else?