• Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even more rage inducing these comments would be the same if she wasn’t conventionally attractive.

      Fucking programmers need a solid clip around the ear.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The funny thing is that in my experience female programmers usually have above average skills. I suspect it’s exactly because of this bias against women in tech. Where an average or below average dude can easily get by, this is much harder for women. As a result this bias acts as a kind of filter which results in female programmers being on average a little better than male programmers because all the average or below average ones get filtered out early.

      • Jonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s hard data to match your experience:

        “This paper presents the largest study to date on gender bias, where we compare acceptance rates of contributions from men versus women in an open source software community. Surprisingly, our results show that women’s contributions tend to be accepted more often than men’s. However, women’s acceptance rates are higher only when they are not identifiable as women. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.”

        https://peerj.com/preprints/1733/

      • 6mementomori@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I might add, in the hostile environment women may feel compelled to try harder at least to make a point. As in, “I’ll show you what I can do”.

      • tquid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s as if, like, if you are a woman, and also in a disfavoured racial category, like, where they, uh, have overlap? Where they meet? It’s not the same as either one individually but its own, I guess nexus? I feel like there’s a better word for this

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          @[email protected] has it right, the term and idea is intersectionality.

          apropos of nothing, intersectionality came out of critical race theory’s analyses of black womens outcomes in the legal system. the particular combination of oppression is literally the textbook example.

        • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think it’s called a “double minority”, but being a woman isn’t really a minority tho (edit: not a minority in the context of being 50% of the human population) so I don’t know if theres a better term than that.

          I feel bad for people who are black, lesbian, neurodivergent, and trans-woman… like that’s a quadruple minority.

          • ReiRose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what minority means in the sociological context. Volume is mathematical. Poor people are a minority and there’s more of them than the 1%. Being a minority is about lack of power, prestige and property. And intersectionality is the more formal term, but ‘double minority’ gets the point across.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is also common in the guitar community. Some women can shred like mofos, and here comes Jim-Bob McGraw saying their playing is tracked etc., ad nauseum