The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Nominative Determinism@feddit.ukEnglish · 7 days ago

I wonder what conclusion his research will reach

6

197

I wonder what conclusion his research will reach

The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Nominative Determinism@feddit.ukEnglish · 7 days ago

6

Chat

P1k1e@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
2
arrow-down
1·
7 days ago
OOOOH SUUUURE! LETS JUST LET BIG WATER TELL US WHAT’S WET AND DRINKABLE! IM SURE THEY STAND TO GAIN NOTHING FROM THAT!

WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!¡!**!!

Nominative Determinism@feddit.uk

nominativedeterminism@feddit.uk

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Nominative determinism is the hypothesis that people tend to gravitate towards areas of work that fit their names. The term was first used in the magazine New Scientist in 1994, after the magazine’s humorous “Feedback” column noted several studies carried out by researchers with remarkably fitting surnames. These included a book on polar explorations by Daniel Snowman and an article on urology by researchers named Splatt and Weedon. These and other examples led to light-hearted speculation that some sort of psychological effect was at work.

This is a community for posting real-world examples of names that by coincidence are funny in context. A link to the article or site is preferable, as well as a screenshot of the funny name if it’s not in the headline. Try not to repost, and keep it fun!

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
121 users / week
427 users / month
884 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
657 subscribers
77 Posts
111 Comments
Modlog

mods:
smeg@feddit.uk