Social security failures coupled with structural gender inequality leave many people in Germany mired in poverty, especially single-parent families and older women.
Major gaps remain in the world’s third richest country between the amount of social security support received and the poverty risk threshold.
The parties in coalition talks should prioritize strengthening social security protections and addressing longstanding structural barriers to gender equality.
The German government is legally obliged to ensure the human rights to social security and to an adequate standard of living contained in international treaties it has promised to uphold. Related treaties, standards, and guidance on social security, from UN and European human rights bodies, set out requirements for social security benefits to be adequate.
Germany’s Constitutional Court has developed jurisprudence on the minimum subsistence level required to live in dignity. This requires the state to ensure that people are left with at least enough of their earnings to cover their necessary living expenses, and to guarantee a minimum level of participation in social, cultural, and political life.
And here we see the gulf between legal requirements and implementation even in still-functioning democracies. It’s still surreal that Germany is holding but the U.S. has failed.
The parties in coalition talks should prioritize strengthening social security protections
If you expect any of that from those two party you haven’t been paying attention.
While the SPD carries ‘Socialist’ in it’s name they are responsible for some of the biggest cuts to social security during the 2000s. The CDU has been railing against ‘Sozialschmarotzer’ for years now and the ‘Christian’ C is only a fig leaf at this point.
Just one thing. The SPD doesn’t carry socialist in its name, they are social democrats. Capitalists with a veneer of social responsibility (which they haven’t taken serious in decades).
CDU/CSU weren’t even nominally Christian in the '90s. It was weird to live somewhere with a secular party with “Christian” in the name and then come home to the beginnings of christofascism under the veneer of secularism. Strange times we live in.
