• cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because non-Tankies generally aren’t ban-happy power trippers who can handle criticism, even done in bad faith, unlike the .ml admins lol

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I meant more like: Why are there so many tankies in a comm meant exclusively to make fun of them? Like for example I’m a devout Muslim and I don’t go pick fights in c/atheistmemes even if I probably won’t get banned for it.

        • Raltoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          In their political system, it’s strictly illegal criticize the government. To the point where you get sent to work camps if you do it publically. And this place makes fun of them without consequences, so they get all fired up and start typing as if they have any sort of authority.

          Because the vast majority of tankies assume they’ll be a high ranking member of the ruling party and get to push others around. While in reality they’d be in some siberian camp trying to dig through permafrost with their bare hands.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh, ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ kinda like the right-wingers who come here to Lemmy, they probably see themselves as some sort of “missionary” trying to “rescue” people from the evils of America. They’re not exactly the politest bunch (once they figure they can’t bring you to “their side” at least)

  • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hate to say that and sound like a tankie but the human rights framework does have a bias. The human rights court has the reputation to mainly work in Africa and overlook the violations done by the west. Which doesn’t annulate human rights violations by authoritarian states of cause but it’s good to be aware of this baggage

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      When most leftists say ‘human rights’ though, they mean the general concept, not international institutions.

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        True. At the minimum, it’s a good way of agitation. Telling a stranger “housing is a human right” for example will pull more people into your movement than telling them “rights are a bourgeois concept and written law (as opposed to community mediation) will never be just but always reproduce existing hierarchies”

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Absolutely true but the problem is that this just fundamentally isn’t a rebuttal to accusations of human rights abuses by countries tankies support. Those still happened and defending them is just as bad as nationalistic chuds who think the US or Israel did nothing wrong.

      So at best it’s whataboutism, which might be at least slightly valid if leftists refused to criticize western powers. But, y’know, we are one of the main groups that does that…

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess I wanted to dialectically both reject and embrace human rights and failed on the second part. One tankie argument I get is that it’s more revolutionary to criticize your own government than others but I never got why not both. While rejecting Russia’s war of aggression, I focus my activism on my government’s climate politics and racist police and foreign policy well knowing that Russia and the US are both worse in these regards.

  • smol_beans@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    The CIA would never make something up, they’ve got a spotless track record

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The credibility of the CIA is not the issue here. No one thinks they’re credible. But y’all treat the CIA as if they unilaterally control every event on the entire earth. It’s absurd.

      Yes, the CIA lies and commits atrocities. But that doesn’t mean every historical atrocity by the Bolsheviks or the CPC or whoever was invented by them. There’s plenty of blame to go around.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cuba, Vietnam, China, Venezuela, the USSR. These are some examples of a lefty functional model of government.

      Fuck off, tankie.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s clearly sarcasm, but the implication is that the human rights violations leftists complain about really are just CIA propaganda.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is how alarming online indoctrination has become. There are apparently plenty of those who don’t know this is obvious sarcasm. These people are too far gone and need to hand in their internet badges and internet guns, and go on a vacation to the front door.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s clearly sarcasm, but the implication is that the human rights violations leftists complain about really are just CIA propaganda.

      • adorno_h8s_ur_jazz_meme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What are you saying exactly? I imagine they are downvoted because the implication is that tankies are correct that leftists who raise concerns over human rights are CIA plants. I can’t imagine anyone thinks this earnest.