• imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have admittedly expounded at length in this thread already. If my point isn’t obvious, I’m not sure how.

    Maybe I explained it slightly better here.

    spoiler

    Generally -40 to 40 are the extremes of livable areas.

    Sure, water is a really good system and it works well.

    And for F that range is -40 to 104. See how you get 64 extra degrees of precision and nearly all of them are double digit numbers? No downside.

    Furthermore F can use its base 10 system to describe useful ranges of temperature such as the 20s, 60s, etc. So you have 144 degrees instead of just 80, and you also have the option to utilize a more broad 16 degree scale that’s also built in.

    You might say that Celsius technically also has an 8 degree scale(10s, 30s), but I would argue that the range of 10 degrees Celsius is too broad to be useful in the same way. In order to scale such that 0C is water freezing and 100C boiling, it was necessary for the units to become larger and thus the 10C shorthand is much less descriptive than the 10F shorthand, at least for most human purposes.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have admittedly expounded at length in this thread already. If my point isn’t obvious, I’m not sure how.

      It’s because you are trying to prove your subjective experience is better than some other subjective experiences.

      It’s just simply not how it works, it might be best to you, but refusing to accept that others subjective experiences differing from yours are valid is frankly narrow minded.

      You are making subjective arguments and acting like they are objective cold hard facts.