• phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    “You asked, we built it” --> “People keep shitting on us for our terrible decisions… Quick let’s do something people actually want to compensate ! Wait let’s also slap AI on it, I’m sure everyone will love that” (Mozilla being Mozilla I guess…)

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Awesome!

    Can you now please make it so that of I have over 100 tabs open that Firefox makes my computer die, even if all those tabs are all pre-killed by a tab closer?

  • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So they’re reintroducing a feature in 2025 that they added to Firefox in 2010 and subsequently removed in 2013. Such progress. Much wow.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Still waiting for mobile, tab groups missing from Firefox mobile is the only reason I’m still using chrome

  • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

    Yeah sure ok. Did the community ask for this too?

    • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      For one second I thought Mozilla might have made something that wasn’t anti-feature… But OF COURSE it’s going to need to have AI 😑

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t care about AI when it’s doing minor things like this it’s when they’re shoving it down our throats and we don’t want it.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I mean, why not?

      They integrated accessibility focused, local, AI pretty well.

      Loads of folks bitched about it because they were triggered by “AI”, but it’s essentially invisible, as it should be.

      I hate naming things, that’s actually something AI is good at, hell yeah, let it name my shit for me please.

      Then again, these communities are always full of Debby downers who hate on everything.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        [Dr. Who meme format]

        Is AI bad?

        It Depends. Large corporate AI hosted at a data centre that consumes a nuclear reactor’s worth of power and a lake’s worth of water for cooling for the purpose of generating slop stolen from Artists and Writers? Yes.

        Locally run embedded AI designed for a specific task to automate small processes or enhance the UI experience with little cost to local computing resources because it’s been properly optimised? No.

        • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          a datacenter is more efficient than lots of smaller individual computers doing calculations independently. They actually make their stuff as efficient as possible, otherwise it hurts margins. So, if you’re against datacenter AI because of power, then just stop using ai. If everyone ran locally, the efficiency would be significantly worse overall.

          I actually hate what llms have become, but efficiency is still not a good way to compare a datacenter to a home computer.

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            A consumer would use a lower token AI compared to large datacenters. I am sure it does less environmental damage, because the home user doesnt need tap water for cooling.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah for now I remain cautiously optimistic. I have not used their ai stuff once but it was also never shoved down my throat and my browsing experience has not been affected at all, and them finally listening to the community and implementing tabs grouping is just great. If they keep it that way I think we’ll be fine

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Was I signed up for some beta? I’ve had firefox groups for a few weeks now.

    And holy shit do I need em.

      • Prontomomo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        A/B testing a very effective mass testing ground, I’m surprised some people don’t do it. Amazon is probably doing a few dozen a/b tests constsntly

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Now, the team is experimenting with smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

    Off course, they found a way to integrate more Ai features.

    • Lodra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the inclusion of some small AI feature is what justified the rest of this work being done. As in, someone got approval for tab groups only because they were smart enough to describe it as “AI powered tab groups“. Just speculation

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I had to enable them: about:config -> browser.tabs.groups.enabled -> true

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Not on my browser they aren’t. They just started offering to make groups one day, and while I want to tear out someone’s tongue for it, it would require far too much effort, and might just be a bit of an overreaction.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    ok, mozilla is at least doing stuff we want along with ai garbage now.

    • pory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Thankfully, the useful changes trickle downstream to Waterfox, LibreWolf, Floorp, etc.

      • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Seems like it creates bills, but also has enough hype behind it to generate investment/donation interest.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          At least the AI runs locally, as opposed to sending everything to someone else’s computer for processing. Local translation in Firefox actually works quite well.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Except right now you lose all of your open tabs if you close the browser with the “X” on pc or if you shut the computer down.

      To make it save your open tabs right now, you have to click the … and then select “exit”.

      • ThePinkUnicorn@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        I think that’s an issue with your install, when I shut down my computer or press the x it restores tabs fine next time I open it.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        When I click history in the menu after reopening firefox, I have an option to restore previous session.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’ve clicked history to get some pages back, but haven’t noticed a restore previous session option. Great if it’s there, but still a large bug that’s been present for quite a while.

  • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 day ago

    Shit, I remember seeing requests for tab groups for like 20 years under an assortment of names and descriptions. Neat to see. Useless for me, but neat to see.

    • PostaL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Now, the team is experimenting with smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

      I bet you one cheap bottle of mineral water they’ll implement this like tomorrow

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 hours ago

      This is a nice feature when you have a group of multiple sites you need quick access to on the regular. For me, I manage around 12 websites in three environments ; dev, test, and prod. Being able to group the websites by environment keeps things organized and somewhat readily available at two clicks (maybe three if you count collapsing a group before opening another group).