• hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Please point out exactly where I said I agree with the original commenter and not that’s it’s just some inference you made.

    I called this one out due to their cuntish attitude.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It was implied by you saying they aren’t contributing anything to the conversation. A conversation based on a statement with no evidence.

      If you’re just out here playing random comment police, then as you were, officer.

      • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I had no intention of such an implication.

        I’m just here callin’ out cunts. And that’s Inspector Nips to you.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You seem genuinely upset that a stranger on the Internet has better things to do than argue with you. If you were genuinely curious, I’d send a few links your way, but you’re just here to argue, so I won’t.

              • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I’m not here to argue anything boyo. I actually agree that Tesla has had good innovations in the battery space. I was a battery control systems engineer for a Formula E team ~5 years ago and I still keep up with the industry.

                I never had anything to do with the Tesla topic though, I wasn’t the one who initially replied. How can no one see that? That’s not why I commented, I thought you were unnecessarily rude.

                Can’t even play random comment police anymore without people getting their panties all bunched up.