In overturning a Court of Appeals decision, the state’s high court examined whether or not a woman simply exposing her breasts constitutes conduct of a sexual nature.
Why is it disingenous? It shows just what you said by the end - that it’s not logical. Doesn’t that make them kind of invalid? What kind of context would make them valid? Just history?
Why is it disingenous? It shows just what you said by the end - that it’s not logical. Doesn’t that make them kind of invalid? What kind of context would make them valid? Just history?