InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 13 hours agoDems consider this a "take down".hexbear.netimagemessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1109arrow-down1imageDems consider this a "take down".hexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square32linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·11 hours agoWe should do landback and call it Golfo de las Américas if that’s what we’re going for.
minus-squareblame [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 hours agowhy is giving it a spanish name landback
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·10 hours agoI mean do landback and then rename stuff. Renaming stuff before landback is just liberal premature emancipation.
minus-squareOldSoulHippie [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-210 hours agoI’d back that. Why not? I really wonder if the next lib president is going to change it back or not. They never “fix” stuff the Republicans do so I would be surprised. I could see them spinning it like I mentioned above just out of sheer laziness
We should do landback and call it Golfo de las Américas if that’s what we’re going for.
why is giving it a spanish name landback
I mean do landback and then rename stuff. Renaming stuff before landback is just liberal premature emancipation.
I’d back that. Why not?
I really wonder if the next lib president is going to change it back or not. They never “fix” stuff the Republicans do so I would be surprised. I could see them spinning it like I mentioned above just out of sheer laziness