• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    It seems like maybe you don’t. Please explain to me how what I said is wrong? If their position is that trans people don’t exist, how can they ban them from the military?

        • Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not saying “gender dysphoria is not a diagnosis that exists anywhere” it’s saying “believing yourself to be transgender is a substantial enough mental illness and flaw in character so as to preclude military service.”

          This claims that having gender dysphoria is some sort of deficiency, and not just a non-standard identifier. This invalidates the identity of trans people, and calls into question their legitimacy.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            OK so you can’t show how this “denies that trans people exist”. We got there in the end.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                You haven’t, and you can’t, because if it was denying trans people exist then the entire EO wouldn’t make any sense because it would be prohibiting people that don’t exist from serving in the military.