It puts a lot of features at the fingertips of the faithful, including the ability to filter whole neighborhoods by religion, ethnicity, “Hispanic country of origin,” “assimilation,” and whether there are children living in the household.

Its core function is to produce neighborhood maps and detailed tables of data about people from non-Anglo-European backgrounds, drawn from commercial sources typically used by marketing and data-harvesting firms.

training videos produced by users show the extent to which evangelical groups are using sophisticated ways to target non-Christian communities, with questionable safeguards around security and privacy.

In one instance, he points to the sharable note-taking function and suggests leaving information for each household, such as “Daughter left for college” and “Mother is in the hospital.”

increasingly popular among Christian supremacist groups, prayerwalking calls on believers to wage “violent prayer” (persistently and aggressively channeling emotions of hatred and anger against Satan), engage in “spiritual mapping” (identifying areas where evil is at work, such as the darkness ruling over an abortion clinic, or the “spirit of greed” ruling over Las Vegas), and conduct prayerwalking (roaming the streets in groups, “praying on-site with insight”).

newly arrived refugees might well find a knock on the door from strangers with knowledge of their personal circumstances distressing—and that’s before these surprise visitors even begin to attempt to convert them.

placing people of different ethnic and religious backgrounds on easy-to-access databases is a dangerous road to go down

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bruh, the Bible says if you even think a family member is considering any other option than Christianity, it’s you’re duty to stop them, even if it means killing them.

    Blood is thicker than water.

    Is a biblical phrase, the full thing is:

    The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.

    It means you’re supposed to put any other Christian, and Christianity as a whole, over family.

    Up to and including pulling an Abraham and murdering family members for not believing exactly the same shit.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is a biblical phrase, the full thing is:

      The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.

      That’s an urban myth.

        • Xhieron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          8 months ago

          Your quote never appears anywhere in any of those citations.

          That the Bible–a collection of religious texts, many of them advancing directly or indirectly the ethnic and national interests of their authors’ people groups–would have stuff in it about killing people for lots of reasons is no surprise.

          But your purported origin of the common proverb in the Bible is a fabrication. It’s not in there, anywhere.

          Also Christianity doesn’t advocate killing non-believers as a matter of doctrine. Plenty of Christians have done that historically, but it’s not a teaching of the religion, and it’s never advocated in the Bible, anywhere.

          There’s plenty to criticize Christians for. I don’t understand why you felt you needed to make something up.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            What quote?

            The blood/water one?

            You know you get better answers with clear questions, right?

            Otherwise this happens where no on has any idea what you’re talking about and just trying to guess what you mean.

            It’s rarely as productive as just being specific in the first place

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              Answer the question. You specifically stated “it’s in the bible”. It was obvious to me, reading this thread, what exactly they meant. Please show us the location of the quote.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Why would you see that for a full day no one had clarified what they asked for…

                And then demand I answer it without still saying what you think theyre asking for?

                I don’t know if you’re trolling or honestly dont see the issue, but it really doesn’t matter.

                Because when you act like that tacking on a “please” doesn’t count as being polite.

                • Maalus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  No, it’s because it is not in the bible and now you are trying to make shit up when called out.

            • PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              The old acknowledged the question but dance around answering it by throwing out another question and attack of character.

              This guy has talked shit online before, this isn’t his first rodeo

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hi, Christian here. No, we are not called upon to kill our family members for not being Christians. Hope this helps.

      And if you’d like to dispute by pointing out verses that imply we should be killing people, please save us both some time and check the context of the verse. Some of them are in parables, and others are of the old law back before there was hope for salvation in Christ. If you find any that are neither, I’d be surprised, but please let me know.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Some of them are in parables, and others are of the old law back before there was hope for salvation in Christ. If

        That would almost matter …

        If Christians weren’t constantly saying they need to pass laws everyone has to follow based on that old shit…

        When you pick and choose and say some have to be followed, but the ones you disagree with don’t.

        It’s what’s called “hypocrisy” in the modern world.

        You can’t claim some stuff you’re forced to make others follow, and other stuff is outdated and we can’t hold it against you

        Gotta pick a lane champ

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pick a lane? I think you’re assuming others’ actions are mine. I don’t force others to follow the Bible at all, because that’s not the biblical way. It has to be a choice, otherwise God might as well force us all directly.

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            A very strongly nagged and heavily pressured and influenced choice.

            There is no magic carpenter and never was, and there is no magic “salvation” that absolves you from responsibility for your actions. Grow up and become an adult.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I didn’t know the origin but wow, that’s the complete opposite of how the phrase gets used today

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          I looked it up after and yeah, not from the Bible. The religious connotation likely came from a sermon from the 1600s that kind of bastardized it

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bruh, the Bible says if you even think a family member is considering any other option than Christianity, it’s you’re duty to stop them, even if it means killing them.

      What verse? I’ve read some wack shit in the Bible, but never that.