• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    That is not even close to being a problem. Age requirements make sense, and so does that of.

    It’s the rest of the shit that’s a problem.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean if that much training is good for some yee-yee 30 y/o, why does it need an age minimum at all? If you “train” them, tf does it matter?

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Legalities.

        In a jurisdiction where there is a minimum age to be able to perform the duties of a job, be it for good reason or not, the employer is obligated to follow that law until it gets changed.

        Since US police training is relatively shit, and there are plenty of jurisdictions where the age limit is 21. I can’t recall offhand at the moment if the post covers where the job opening is/was, but that could be looked up.

        Six months of training to start as a cop is not impossible. Again, that’s by jurisdiction, there’s no single limit afaik. With US police training being shit, a six month span of training wouldn’t surprise me at all.

        If that’s the case, and they’re being required the be able to legally carry in their jurisdiction, then dropping the minimum age to apply and be hired for training six months makes as much sense as it only being six months of training in the first place.

        Frankly though? I remember that age. I remember how damn many of the people my age at the time were complete idiots. I would be perfectly fine with the age limit being higher than 21 to be a cop. There is such a thing as maturity coming with age. It might not be perfect, but you usually weed out the real idiots by the late twenties.