• swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sexy woman coded, perhaps, unless you’re saying that women who don’t have prominent breasts and what appears to be makeup aren’t real women

    Why are you conflating “real”ness with sexiness?

    But this is a drawing of a machine. Machines don’t have gender, biological or social or otherwise.

    This is actually incorrect. Gender is a social construct. Anything can have gender if (a) society agrees upon it.

    Whoever created this image thought, consciously or not, “I’m going to make a picture of a robot, and I’m gonna make it a sexy woman robot.” Not just a “woman-coded” humanoid robot […]

    You have not proved this.

    because that can be done without playing heavy on the sexiness, right?

    Again, the image is not particularly sexy. Just having large breast-analogs in the picture doesn’t make it sexy, unless you’re a stereotypical teenage boy.

    So why? Why make a sexy woman robot? I ask again: Am I supposed to want to fuck it?

    You have not earned the right to ask these questions.