As the title says, should I be concerned? I get the impression this is just a bureaucratic change (company doesn’t want to deal with both salaried and hourly workers for timesheet reporting). But I’d like to make sure.

  • odelik@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Salary non-exempt guarantees you’re paid at least the 40 hours a week + overtime.

    I’d push back and say that this is a terms of contract change and get your peers to do the same.

    • Atyno@dmv.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d assume you meant just the 40 hours right? As far as I can tell I could still get overtime since it’s non-exempt either way.

      • odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No, what I mean is that salary guarantees you get @ least 40 hours of pay (assuming salaried full-time). If you show up for work and they send you home, as a salaried employee you still get paid. Or if you finish the alloted work for the week early, you still get paid for 40.

        After all of that is when non-exempt comes into play with OT pay according to federal & state regulations and any contract guarantees that go above those regulations.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unless you’re in a union, there’s probably not much you can do when your employer wants to change your contract, other than quit.