• potoo22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m reading this as crime rates would be reduced by 82%. Not 100%, but that’s pretty damn good. And given that women are more likely to attack people they know, discord amoung your friend group or family would be more dangerous than walking in public.

    • Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      It also makes me curious what percentage of that 18% was directed towards men as opposed to women. All that would be left in this hypothetical is women-on-women violence, so anything else should be discounted for a fair comparison.

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        You see how that’s still bad right? I’m saying let’s not just ignore ANY of these statistics and y’all are trying to do gymnastics to make a dumb meme more rational.

          • Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yeah, exactly - that’s what I mean. Hypothetically, if 50% of the violence done by women involves men, then the 82% is really more like 91%, and the violence attributed to women starts to look more and more like a rounding error. This meme is getting more rational all the time. It’s almost like bringing statistics into it does nothing but present a lame fig leaf to cover up the underlying, endemic problem that inspired the meme in the first place.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      16 days ago

      Alright then you’re just here to meme and not actually talk about real problems.

      • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 days ago

        Perfect is the enemy of good. In the real world we celebrate drops by like 1%. Disregarding *every *other issue with this hypothetical situation, a drop by 82% would be oh so incredibly world changing.

        You aren’t wrong because violence is violence no matter the offender, but by bringing “whataboutism” in, you are arguably demonstrating bad faith right off the bat starting your discussion. At this point, if you are serious about wanting to tangent and discuss about solving the last 18%, maybe take it to its own thread? Like over to showerthoughts or asklemmy? I do think that’s always worth discussing, as is discussing how to solve the original 82% without the nuclear option. :)

        Finally, this community is kind of memey. Let the witches cook.