• Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The part of the article we would be most concerned with would probably be:

    (d) medical facilities, medical equipment, medical supplies or medical transportation;

    This, in my understanding is generally considered to be actual hospitals and field hospitals;

    Transport: ambulance, Helicopters and planes;

    Medical equipment: critical equipment and tools;

    Medical supplies: Supply drops or small deliveries en route to a military unit.

    Ultimately, I’m not a lawyer, I just teach some material. If there was an argument as to whether or not it breaches the protocol that would be up to an international criminal court, maybe UN scrutiny? I start to lose the ball around here.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Thank you for the insight, I’m still unsure if this is a war crime but it likely warrants scrutiny from the relevant authorities.

      I think people often chuck the declaration of war crime around a bit too quickly and without a proper understanding.

      • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m glad I could be of a little help. Nations have been trying to clearly define these things for centuries.

        I think your final statement is why I’m here. A lot of internet discourse around war immediately resorts to calling everything a war crime. That’s an incredibly precise label and we can’t always be certain. What I know for sure is that war is hell and undue suffering is wrong.