They rate Zionist propaganda websites such as UNWatch as credible so that really tells you all you need to know. Wikipedia also rejects MBFC as a reliable source. It is insane that anyone still uses that garbage website.
If you want a good laugh look at why MBFC rates “mondoweiss” as unreliable.
For example one of the source labeled as extremist was labeled like that by adl which defended musk when he did the nazi salute but compared thr Palestinian keffiyeh to the Nazi swastika.
You should you own research and determine by yourself what you find extremist or not
What i meant is mediafactcheck labeled a source as extremist because adf labeled it like that. So even in mediafactcheck you should read sources articles and decide by yourself which source is not credible and post extremist views
I might as well just have rolled some dice. Which is concerning.
Then also I don’t know half of those sources. But some of them are rated extremist by mediabiasfactcheck.org.
MBFC is a Zionist propaganda website.
I’ll have to look further into that. Thank you for letting me know
They rate Zionist propaganda websites such as UNWatch as credible so that really tells you all you need to know. Wikipedia also rejects MBFC as a reliable source. It is insane that anyone still uses that garbage website.
If you want a good laugh look at why MBFC rates “mondoweiss” as unreliable.
For example one of the source labeled as extremist was labeled like that by adl which defended musk when he did the nazi salute but compared thr Palestinian keffiyeh to the Nazi swastika.
You should you own research and determine by yourself what you find extremist or not
And that’s the first time I learned about the adf. As far as I know, they’re nazi apologists
What i meant is mediafactcheck labeled a source as extremist because adf labeled it like that. So even in mediafactcheck you should read sources articles and decide by yourself which source is not credible and post extremist views
Ey, good point! I did not look that deep!