not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to FuckMusk@lemmy.caEnglish · 6 days agoso much more expensive for the tax payer toolemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square72linkfedilinkarrow-up1732arrow-down135file-text
arrow-up1697arrow-down1imageso much more expensive for the tax payer toolemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to FuckMusk@lemmy.caEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square72linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·5 days agoHow is it reusable if they all fail?
minus-squareatx_aquarian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days agoNot pictured (that’s called cherry-picking): Falcon 9 has 469 successful launches for a >99% success rate right now.
minus-squareZron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoFalcon 9 was designed by a different engineer who has since left SpaceX, and was originally intended to have a reusable second stage like Starship, but that never happened either.
minus-squareDogWater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoJust Google it before you speak lmao
How is it reusable if they all fail?
Not pictured (that’s called cherry-picking): Falcon 9 has 469 successful launches for a >99% success rate right now.
Falcon 9 was designed by a different engineer who has since left SpaceX, and was originally intended to have a reusable second stage like Starship, but that never happened either.
Just Google it before you speak lmao