• Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If the fight starts when you’re already at a close range melee weapons have a very decent chance of coming out on top over firearms. Maybe not the sock but bats and knives definitely.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The loser of the knife fight dies at the scene the winner dies on the way to the hospital

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Knives have an advantage at close range at causing potentially fatal damage vs a gun, but a gun can still kill you if you don’t gain control of the muzzle. With a common pocket knife, your best bet is a fatal throat stab or slash to ending the threat because anywhere else you can’t reach or won’t act fast enough. Maybe you can disable an arm if you can separate a muscle or sever a tendon in the forearm, but we are getting into experienced knife combat there. Not that knives are relevant, we were talking bats and a sock with coins.

      A gun would easy win against someone with a bat or coins in a sock, the gunman only has to get in contact range to reduce swing force or get out of contact range. The bat or sock with coins is a 3-4ft radius of danger, the gun basically has range dependant on skill.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        A gun would easy win against someone with a bat or coins in a sock

        After being hit with a bat, I’d wager about 2 in 5 people would still even be holding their gun. If the bat hits the gun, hand, arm or head, 0 in 5 are still holding that gun.

        Now that’s assuming the bat gets a swing in, but in close quarters it’s entirely possible.