That’s like saying “I’m pro-life and anti-gun control”.

Oh. Wait.

Edit: Guy confirmed that he is, indeed, pro-life and anti-gun control.

    • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Private jets are also a privilege, should we demolish all airports? Private schools too, should we have no education-only infrastructure?

      The issue with car-centric infrastructure is that it prioritizes expensive and inefficient systems over others. It’s the priority that’s the issue, not the existence of roads at all.

      What would car-only infrastructure even look like? A highway that busses aren’t allowed on? No utility vehicles? No firefighters?

      • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Private jets are also a privilege, should we demolish all airports? Private schools too, should we have no education-only infrastructure?

        Public airports aren’t exclusive to private jets and private schools aren’t publicly funded.

        Please be more careful next time, you’re scaring all the birds.

        What would car-only infrastructure even look like?

        Every single road where pedestrians or alternative modes of transportation aren’t allowed and isn’t part of a public bus route is car-only infrastructure.

        A highway that busses aren’t allowed on?

        These exist. You are aware these exist, right?

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Public airports aren’t exclusive to private jets and private schools aren’t publicly funded.

          Roads aren’t exclusive to cars and most of the private schools around here do receive public funding. Just because something is used poorly doesn’t mean it’s completely useless.

          Every single road where pedestrians or alternative modes of transportation aren’t allowed and isn’t part of a public bus route is car-only infrastructure.

          The only road around here that pedestrians and bicycles are explicitly barred from are the freeways, where blocking traffic is very dangerous, but busses, utility vehicles, and industrial vehicles use those all the time.

          A highway that busses aren’t allowed on?

          These exist. You are aware these exist, right?

          No, I’m not aware of public roads where it’s physically impossible to run a bus line or ride a bike. If a sedan can use it, a bike can use it. If a delivery truck can fit, so can a bus.

          I am aware of roads too dangerous to bike on and roads too sparce of destinations to run busses on, but that’s because of how roads are used, not a condemnation of roads themselves. If the city decides to add a bus route to a road, no infrastructure needs to be changed. If someone decides to send a charter bus or shuttle, the roads are open to them.