So according to the ethics of veganism it’s about valuing sentient life and animal consent.

So I pose a few questions.

  1. Is it justified to buy animal based dog and cat food?

  2. Is it justifiable to force a dog or cat to be vegan?

If 1 is justifiable then the claim that it’s unethical for humans to eat meat is untrue since feeding your pets meat requires more animals to be raised for slaughter.

If 2 is true then it violates animal consent because there are zero dogs or cats that prefer vegan food to meat and infact are naturally omnivorous in the case of dogs or pure carnivores in the case of cats.

So the logical conclusion would be owning meat eating pets in impossible while being vegan.

Then it leads to the ethics of what happened to the breeds of cats and dogs no longer able to be pets.

  • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Scenario 1: you leave the dog at the shelter and it eventually gets killed.

    Scenario 2: you bring the dog home and feed it so that it doesn’t get killed.

    I don’t see any ethical issue with my dogs eating the same foods I do. Why would i order the deaths of other animals for the sake of their taste buds?

    • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t see any ethical issue with my dogs eating the same foods I do.

      Dogs can’t eat grapes, onions, garlic, cashews, almonds, chocolate etc. There’s some pretty big ethical issues feeding your dogs the same food you eat.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Dogs totally can. They are omnivores like us and evolved alongside us. Obviously they’d eat meat if given the choice so it’s still a restrictive diet that they never got to choose for themselves, and that’s an ethical minefield for vegans, but they can totally live on plants.

        Cats are carnivores. I don’t think they can live a full healthy life without at least some meat.

        • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          Cats require specific vitamins such as taurine, which in nature would be derived from meat. In 21st century society, it is produced synthetically and easily supplemented.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Pets don’t get to choose what they eat, vegan or otherwise. Most pets thrive just fine on eating more or less the same couple foods all their life. “forcing therm” to eat vegan food is ethically the same as “forging them” to eat regular kibble.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Right, because pets are not free to make their own choices. They’re property.

            That’s the ethical minefield I was talking about.

            • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              That a dumb take. Small children are also not free to pick the food they eat. Their parent chose their food. Are children property? If that’s a minefield, it’s a pretty weak one.

              • Sackeshi@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                The difference is children spend 1/5 to 1/4 of their life being “not free” the animals you force to eat vegan spend their whole life stuck in that life style

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                When parents decide to deprive their children of vaccines, or block them from gender affirming care, or use corporal punishment, or any other things that “parental rights” freaks believe in- what do you think that is?

                A huge portion of people consider children to be property, they want the right to control their children and to abuse them however they want.

                • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Those things are actively harming children. Supplemented vegan food is not like being violent to pets.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    You might be misunderstanding what I mean by “minefield”. Controlling someone’s food is a minefield because it is possible to make misteps. You can accidentally veer into abuse without extreme caution i.e. accidentally step on a mine.

                    That doesn’t mean controlling your pet’s diet is inherently abusive. It’s just a minefield. Don’t mistep.

    • Sackeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because dogs are NOT herbavors and it’s not consenting to that life style. Even “vegan” dogs will eat meat if given the chance.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        See the scenarios above. Are you suggesting that dogs would choose death over a life where they dont get to eat their favourite foods?

          • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            The choice they are given, as a result of the society we live in, is eat a plant-based diet with an adoptive family, or be killed by the state.

            Unadopted dogs don’t get released into the wild to live freely and fend for themselves, they get killed.

            The lesser-harm option seems pretty clear.