I want to get y’all thoughts on it. I want to avoid having 5,000 rules that are impossible to follow, but this one seems prudent.

Just a simple [Satire] in the titles would be enough.

Edit: I won’t add a rule about a satire tag.

  • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    When you post lefty stuff, it buries the right wing stuff.

    It’s almost like conservatism isn’t able to compete in a true free market of ideas.

    They upvote lefty stuff and downvote right wing stuff, regardless of quality or facts or anything.

    Dude you’ve been posting shit like breitbart here. You don’t actually care about quality or facts.

    It allows for diversity of thought

    Banning posts that are critical of conservatism is not “diversity of thought”.

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      tbh it makes sense that the right wingers’ channel may need a tag to discern satire from reality.

    • Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Dude you’ve been posting shit like breitbart here. You don’t actually care about quality or facts.

      Even when I post stuff directly from amnesty international, it gets downvoted. https://lemm.ee/post/12963343?scrollToComments=true

      Downvotes are not about source. It’s about agree/disagree.

      Also you can’t read minds.

      Banning posts that are critical of conservatism is not “diversity of thought”.

      Which is why I added “on a site scale” which you conveniently didn’t copy over. This sub doesn’t exist in a vacuum, there’s plenty of places for lefty content, and you can subscribe to both. Like the .world sub.

      Its a bit like saying a cat sub should also have dog posts. Theres a place for dogs, and theres a place for cats. You don’t need to muddy the waters.

      • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Even when I post stuff directly from amnesty international, it gets downvoted.

        Because this is c/conservative, and like I said, conservatism is incapable of competing in a true, free market of ideas.

        Also you can’t read minds.

        No, but I guarantee you that I read way more liberal comments than you do.

        This sub doesn’t exist in a vacuum

        For some people it will be.

        Its a bit like saying a cat sub should also have dog posts.

        No it’s not, because dog/cat topics don’t influence votes, which have immense, real world consequences.

        • Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Im not going to bother with the rest, its not worth the effort, but

          which have immense, real world consequences.

          This sub has 44 subscribers and 68 users/month. Thats not immense by any stretch of the imagination.

            • Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              In any case, its not immense now, and I think its good for lemmy. Has /r/conservative lead to anything bad?

              • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Has /r/conservative lead to anything bad?

                It definitely contributed toward’s Trump’s presidency to say the least.