• ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    That is probably a slam dunk (minor) discrimination lawsuit. Your circumstances of birth, including the date, are not something you can be judged for.

    Follow up with your ID or Birth certificate and ask “Excuse me?”

    • blaine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      @ocassionallyaduck

      @The_Picard_Maneuver

      Not true in the US. They could ban anyone born in the entire month of April, or anyone who “looks like a pot smoker” if they wanted to.

      Applicants, employees and former employees are ONLY protected from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information (including family medical history).

      • flyingjake@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder if an argument could be made that birthdate is a component of your genetic information including family medical history? It is also potentially age discrimination?

        • Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Technically this is discrimination based on age.

          They were born 4/20/(year). You could make an argument they are discriminating all people exactly (X) years, 4 months, and 2 days old.

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah we typically thing age discrimination is saying we only hire people between 20-40y/o but it would also cover it if you said “I won’t hire someone 21 years old only” and still applies to banning someone 21.5 years old. And 21 years and 6 months and 27 days old.

            Same applies if I ban anyone with an age divisible by 3. It’s a group of people, but if their age has anything to do with why you aren’t hiring them then I’d say this applies.

          • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Are you being sarcastic? Or does being rejected for a job for being ‘too young’ fall under a different discrimination law?
            (Genuine question, i have no idea)

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It wouldn’t get anywhere in the US. Age is the closest protected class, but only applies to over 40 in the US. Discrimination based on month and day of birth isn’t actually illegal.

      • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I honestly think there’s a gray area here and it’s worth talking to a lawyer if anything. There are certainly some protections for peoples under 40. Being denied a promotion because you’re “too young” is certainly a protection. The catch is you have to prove it.

        This case is easy to prove though if there are any laws over this.

        Edit: but now that I think about it, this is only really a protection if you’re already hired at the place. If you just slam the door on people before they can get in, discrimination seems to be legal.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    What always ticks me off beyond reason in mails like these is the “we genuinely appreciate your time and effort in…”

    Fuck. You. With. An. Umbrella.

    You don’t appreciate shit, you’re full of shit, yet you’re too shit to even just say what you really want to say: fuck you, we don’t give a damn. Because being actually honest might also be bad and cost money.

    Companies like there are the worse and should all burn in hell

    • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Now I’m imagining someone legitimately putting their Jan6 involvement on a resume.

      Window Structural Integrity Tester (Jan 6th, 2021): Responsibilities included - unconventional team-building activities, conditioning, navigating unfamiliar territory, and breaking down barriers.

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, it’d probably be more like:

        Security Field Tester (Jan 6, 2021): Part of a group that organized a large-scale “peaceful march” in order to thoroughly check security protocols for the Capitol building. Duties included attempts at theft to see if we’d be stopped, testing window durability by attempting to break them, engaging physically with security staff in riot gear to test security training, and shouting terroristic threats in order to see how secure government protocols were in the event of a riot at a governmental building.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Honestly, they might even consider it fortunate that the company showed them it’s cards now and not when they’re their actual employer. Dodged a bullet.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is most likely fake.

    If this was automated, a company automating rejection emails would never write the reason for rejection. It would be a vague excuse like “not a good fit for the role”.

    If this was not automated, then no recruiter would be this stupid.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This can’t be real. There are so many red flags this is fake. 1) Everything is censored. 2) GIS (Google image search) lookup only shows reddit and linkedin. The linkedin post is just as vague “learned a colleague received this!” 3) It’s too good to be true. it plays on current fears. 4) It’s just so dumb.

    • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I fucking hate people like you.

      “Everything on Reddit/Lemmy is fake and gay. Here’s my evidence.”

      All evidence easily has an explanation, most of it laughably so.

      What do idiots who claim everything is fake get out of it? To troll the OP? Or do you just want to spread your misery?

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      1 is in no way a red flag, don’t put other’s personally identifying information on the Internet.