• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not up to you or me to say what’s admissable or not. The gun in the video is the gun in the backpack. If you want to argue the cops planted it, then you have to explain how they got it.

    Occams Razor - Luigi failed to ditch the gun.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/12/us/unitedhealthcare-ceo-shooting-suspect-thursday-hnk

    “Marked shell casings from the assassination scene match the gun found on the suspect. His fingerprints match some key items investigators found nearby. And he was arrested this week – after going silent from his mom and friends for months – with a fake ID and a handwritten “claim of responsibility” referencing the crime site.”

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s not up to you or me to say what’s admissable or not

      https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/us/luigi-mangione-evidence-illegal-search

      It might be the gun.

      It might even have been in the backpack and Luigi just had it on him.

      But it doesn’t matter, the cops pulled a Mark Furhman. They’re not used to having to follow the law, so they fuck up high profile shit.

      Nothing in the backpack will be admissable. And all the evidence was from the backpack.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Shell casings from the crime scene match the gun found in the backpack. It’s the same gun. See the cited article above.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s no evidence the cops knew ANYTHING about the gun until it was found in his possession.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m not lying here, I can’t prove a negative. If you want to assert the cops planted the evidence, the burden of proof is on you.

                So far, there is none.

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    It’s not a deliberate lie to say we have photos of Mangione wearing the exact same outfit as the shooter in the same general time and place a the shooting and when he got turned in at the McDonalds, he was carrying the gun and a hand-written manifesto.

                    Look, I’m sorry you can’t recognize reality when you see it. But the idea that the cops in New York somehow collected evidence for the cops in Pennsylvania to plant on him is absolute nonsense.

                    No cop had the slightest clue who he was until the McDonalds turned him in.