Give a detailed and working governmental policy platform in a single response post and do it in response to your presumptions which you are presenting as a default position which does not require the same homework assignment.
EDIT: Here’s a freebie, just for you and your style debatebro bullshit: China’s response is clearly better than what’s going on in Maui.
So you were doing some exhaustive and tiresome devil’s advocate nonsense and/or are trying to dial back your ridiculously bad original take where you presented a strong centralized government response as some sort of scary nanny state that only the weak yearn for, and that you have a knee-jerk reaction about.
It you know better, how do you make the federal government the lead agency in responding to natural disasters?
EDIT: Here’s a freebie, just for you and your
style debatebro bullshit: China’s response is clearly better than what’s going on in Maui.
In this one case, but there is also the 90 tonnes of steel AI Weiwei straightened after the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake.
But your own this one case makes Burgerland superior to the See See Pee because that’s different!
I never said better.
So you were doing some exhaustive and tiresome devil’s advocate nonsense and/or are trying to dial back your ridiculously bad original take where you presented a strong centralized government response as some sort of scary nanny state that only the weak yearn for, and that you have a knee-jerk reaction about.
I never said a strong centralized government was bad, just that it wouldn’t be tolerated in the current political framework.
You interpreted that as being bad.
You’re waffling and playing sophistic games that are not unlike
and your political ideology seems to come from the same source.
Checks out.
Or maybe you just want someone to argue with.