if a doomsday were ro actually happen, you would most likely want to do the bunker one. Remember that in the bigger picture you’re just an expendable bystander, no need for action movie stunts
Bunker is short term safe long term unsustainable. Mutual aid is long term necessary but won’t do shit against bombs or deadly weather and is less effective against marauders.
It’s not action hero stunts you need, it’s enough people to stand guard at night without sacrificing your ability to grow food and secure clean water.
bunker dude will come crawling to the support network in 3 months
bunker guy is gonna die when his hungry neighbors come knocking
Either is better than the average consoomer. Frankly both are in a better place to be generous with what they have. Everyone should aspire to independence. When one acquires wealth one should be generous. Help mothers, help the poor etc
Just here tryna swipe the picture like an idiot
I dunno the mission and the gun seem a bit incompatible, not sure either of these dudes are looking all that above board
Go far enough left and you get your guns back
That explains a lot about me. I am pretty damn leftist, but have like 50 guns.
the gun is for dealing with right-wing monsters who want to live like a warlord after the end
Building said network will be impossible without at least the capacity for violence, and ideally the minimum application of it.
So, like, a government?
Under some definition probably but ideally a radically different form that emphasizes bottom up economic and political systems
Yes, but a much better one than the current one.
Yep
Okay you kinda of have to be really high in IQ to get this but listen. I think the artist was kind of genius here. he decided, and this is the very cool part, to draw the morally dubious character as the smoking doomer guy, whereas the moralle flawless one, wow, is the big sexy chad boy, i am in awe. truly the auteur was one of a kind.
